|
|
Post by tomoe on May 25, 2014 16:25:40 GMT -5
People (like me) are quick to point out where a movie made changes to a character or plot line that didn't work or that they didn't like. What about when they make alterations that, while not in keeping with the source material, actually works or is interesting? Can you think of examples that, while you may not want to see it become comic book continuity, still is entertaining? For example, I really liked what they did with Falcon. I thought they stayed true to the core of the character, while at the same time, updating the character so he fit into the type of story they were telling.
|
|
|
|
Post by Bob Reyer on May 25, 2014 16:30:32 GMT -5
People (like me) are quick to point out where a movie made changes to a character or plot line that didn't work or that they didn't like. What about when they make alterations that, while not in keeping with the source material, actually works or is interesting? Can you think of examples that, while you may not want to see it become comic book continuity, still is entertaining? For example, I really liked what they did with Falcon. I thought they stayed true to the core of the character, while at the same time, updating the character so he fit into the type of story they were telling. Sadly because there are always wars and armed conflicts, up-dating Tony Stark's injury from the Vietnam War to the modern Middle East was positively seamless! |
|
|
|
Post by chrisfabulous on May 28, 2014 11:50:51 GMT -5
I sometimes like how unconnected stories become connected in the movies. Sometimes it's bad, or too much, but merging Weapon X with God Loves Man Kills and having Stryker be the head of the Weapon X program instead of a preacher (which falls somewhat flat with me, honestly) was really cool.
|
|
|
|
Post by sammiecassell on May 31, 2014 8:36:09 GMT -5
I didn't mind the change from Wasp and Hank Pym to Black Widow and Hawkeye as original Avengers. While I like Hank & Janet, and the abuse storyline is one of the more emotional ones in comics. Visual and storytelling wise, it probably made more sense to go the way they did
|
|
|
|
Post by scouts1998 on Jun 2, 2014 1:47:03 GMT -5
a lot of what they did with Thor worked well like rainbow bridge (which was amazing) and getting rid of toothgnasher and toothgrider which wouldn't work.
But you have to remember about captain america and how they still had WW2 cap and not making him a miracle of modern medicine instead. So it is possible to translate the original stuff over to the big screen.
|
|
Jay
Fearless Defender
Posts: 43 
|
Post by Jay on Jun 2, 2014 11:39:50 GMT -5
I like the changes they made to Jane Foster especially since I never liked Donald Blake.
|
|
|
|
Post by wamphari on Aug 14, 2014 17:10:48 GMT -5
I like the changes they made to Jane Foster especially since I never liked Donald Blake. I'm currently reading the original Avengers series and every time he turns into Donald Blake I'm like awww (awww here for disapointment.) |
|
